« Making Staircases More Fun to Use | Volkswagen's Theory of Fun | Main | Fresh Media Event | Saturday, October 24, 2009 »

Marge Simpson in Playboy

By Claudia Ho

Disclaimer: The images below may appear graphic depending on your sensitivity to sexualizing cartoons. Also, this doesn't really have anything to do with ethnicity or being ethnic cool, but I just really wanted to share!

The Simpsons have chosen a very unique way of celebrating their 20th anniversary. Featured on the cover of Playboy's November 2009 issue is none other than Mrs. Marge Simpson.

Marge_Playboy.jpg

Marge Simpson posing for Playboy. Wow. The notion is perplexing and I can't figure out if this is a good thing or a bad thing. However, some devout Christians are having a field day over the matter, saying that Marge was supposed to be the "cartoon matriarch of The Simpsons**" and thus, there are some people who are mortally shocked at the character's unabashed nudity.

Here is what American Family Association has to say:

"Pornography promotes a hedonistic lifestyle that is often highly addictive, harmful to marriages and influences anti-social and sometimes criminal behavior," AFA (American Family Association) says. "In the eyes of most women, pornography is degrading and highly offensive."**

**Excerpted from Belief Net News

The debate on pornography is a touchy subject and I do not intend to explore this idea whatsoever—at least not in this blog. However, it's interesting to hear other people's opinions. Perhaps you should take a look at the photos and judge for yourself...

marge-simpson-topless.jpg

Ok, in my opinion, this photo isn't so bad. I think there's an episode where Marge gets carried away with modelling and decides to get breast implants. The above photo reminds me of a scene where she accidentally exposes herself while on the cat walk.

To be honest though, I'm a little confused right now. If the above image was extracted from or inspired by an episode that had actually aired on national television, completely uncensored in its intention, why the uproar now? Moreover, it appears to me that Marge has deviated slightly from her matriarchal image since most networks have allowed increasing leniency on censorship.

marge-simpson-bikini-pic.jpg

This photo is actually kind of creepy. Her eyes are dilated, perhaps suggesting that the notion of displaying "erotic" portrayals of Marge Simpson is, in itself, a little wacky.

The sad thing is, despite every intuition I have against buying this Playboy issue (e.g. Playboy's deliberate targeting of a wider readership and the "just-plain-wrong" vibe that keeps nagging), I am excruciatingly tempted to just go out and grab one off the shelf. Out of dying curiosity, of course.

Sources:
Ghoststyle's Blog Thanks, Dougie!
Puggal Article
Belief Net News

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.schemamag.ca/mt/mt-tb.cgi/1344

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)









October 19, 2009 at 1:34 AM
Comments (0)

Tags: Magazines, TV

Recent Posts

Homeless Man as Fashion Icon | Brother Sharp

Latinocanadà

Shop For Free! At The Frock Swap 4.0

Saul Williams: Video Interview on Grounded TV

Queen Yu-Na/Bond Girl: Behind the Scenes

Michael Phelps & Scott Lago Accuse Lainey Lui as Asian Medal-Biter

How to Be Part of World Expo in Shanghai | Jointhewall.org

The Ommwriter: Taking Paradise to You

Advertisement

Tags

 (22)   (1)   (1)   (3)   (2)   (1)   (6)   (47)   (1)   (11)   (12)   (4)   (1)   (2)   (5)   (5)   (15)   (1)   (9)   (4)   (4)   (1)   (10)   (5)   (42)   (1)   (1)   (11)   (1)   (70)   (2)   (27)   (2)   (1)   (1)   (17)   (7)   (45)   (2)   (1)   (15)   (7)   (6)   (1)   (19)   (2)   (5)   (4)   (76)   (57)   (1)   (2)   (3)   (93)   (8)   (1)   (45)   (2)   (3)   (33)   (3)   (2)   (1)   (1)   (1)   (1)   (1)   (7)   (3)   (20)   (2)   (16)   (2)   (1)   (1)   (5)   (10)   (35)   (5)   (2)   (3)   (36)   (1)   (2)   (1)   (50)   (1)   (22)   (1)   (35)   (4)   (1)   (1)   (2)   (2)   (8)   (1)   (22)   (2)   (29)   (26)   (25)   (12)   (1)   (10)   (43)   (2)   (1)   (39)   (1) 

Archives

March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement